Home
Class 12
PHYSICS
The gravitational attraction between ele...

The gravitational attraction between electron and proton in a hydrogen atom is weaker than the coulomb attraction by a factor of about `10^(-40)`. An alternative way of looking at this fact is to estimate the radius of the first Bohr orbit of a hydrogen atom if the electron and proton were bound by gravitational attraction. You will find the answer interesting.

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

Radius of first orbit hydrogen atom in Bohr model.
`r=(n^(2)h^(2) epsi_(0))/(pi me_(e)e^(2))`
Taking n=1 for first orbit,
`r=(h^(2)epsi_(0))/(pi m_(e)e^(2))xx(4pi)/(4pi)`
`=(h^(2)xx4pi epsi_(0))/(4pi^(2)m_(e)e^(2))`
`:. r=(h^(2))/(4pi m_(e)ke^(2)) ....(1) [ :. 4pi epsi_(0)=(1)/(k)]`
Now coulomb force between proton and electron
`F_(e)=(ke^(2))/(r^(2)) " "....(2)`
Now coulomb force between proton and electron
`F_(G)=(Gm_(p)m_(e))/(r^(2)).....(3)`
From equation (2) and (3),
`ke^(2)=Gm_(p)m_(e)`
`r_(G)=(h^(2))/(4pi^(2)m_(e)xxGm_(p)m_(e))`
`:.r_(G)=((6.625xx10^(-34))^(2))/(4xx(3.14)^(2)xx6.67xx10^(-11)xx(1.67xx10^(-27)xx(9.1xx10^(-31))^(2))`
`:.r_(G)=(43.890625)/(36378.46)xx10^(32)`
`=0.01206xx10^(32)`
`=1.21xx10^(29)m`
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • ATOMS

    KUMAR PRAKASHAN|Exercise NUMERICAL FROM DARPAN BASED ON TEXTBOOK|10 Videos
  • ATOMS

    KUMAR PRAKASHAN|Exercise SECTION-C (NCERT EXEMPLAR SOLUTION) (Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs))|7 Videos
  • ATOMS

    KUMAR PRAKASHAN|Exercise SECTION-B (Numerical From Textual Exercise)|15 Videos
  • ALTERNATING CURRENTS

    KUMAR PRAKASHAN|Exercise SECTION-D MCQs (COMPETITIVE EXAMS)|64 Videos
  • BOARD'S QUESTION PAPER MARCH-2020

    KUMAR PRAKASHAN|Exercise PART-B SECTION -C|4 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

In a hydrogen atom, the centripetal force is furnished by the coloumb attraction between electron and proton. If a_(0) is the radius of first state orbit and permittivity of vacuum is in_(0) , then the speed of the electron is.... [m = mass of electron, e = charge on electron]

is found experimentally that 13.6 eV energy is required to separate a hydrogen atom into a proton and an electron. Compute the orbital radius and the velocity of the electron in a hydrogen atom.

Coulomb's law for electrostatic force between two point charges and Newton's law for gravitational force between two stationary point masses, both have inverse-square dependence on the distance between the charges and masses respectively, (a) Compare the strength of these forces by determining the ratio of their magnitudes (i) for an electron and a proton and (ii) for two protons. (b) Estimate the accelerations of electron an proton due to the electrical force of the mutual attraction when they are =10^(-10)m apart? (m_(p) = 1.67 xx 10^(-27) kg, m_(e) = 9.11 xx 10^(-31) kg)

In a hydrogen atom, the electron and proton are bound at a distance of about 0.53 Å (a) Estimate the potential energy of the system in eV, taking the zero of the potential energy at infinite separation of the electron from proton. (b) What is the minimum work required to free the electron, given that its kinetic energy in the orbit is half the magnitude of potential energy obtained in (a)? (c) What are the answers to (a) and (b) above if the zero of potential energy is taken at 1.06 Å separation?

A great physicist of this century (P.A.M. Dirac) loved playing with numerical values of Fundamental constants of nature. This led him to an interesting observation. Dirac found that from the basic constants of atomic physics(c,e, mass of electron, mass of proton) and the gravitational constant G, he could arrive at a number with the dimension of time. Further, it was a very large number, its magnitude being close to the present estimate on the age of the universe (~ 15 billion years). From the table of fundamental constants in this book, try to see if you too can construct this number (or any other interesting number you can think of ). If its coincidence with the age of the universe were significant , what would this imply for the constancy of fundamental constants ?