Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
STATEMENT-1 : Lu(OH)(3) is more basic th...

STATEMENT-1 : `Lu(OH)_(3)` is more basic than `Ce(OH)_(3)`
and
STATEMENT-2: `Lu^(+3)` has smaller size than `Ce^(+3)`

A

Statement-1 is True , Statement-2 is True , Statement-2 is a correct explanation for Statement-1

B

Statement-1 is True , Statement-2 is True , Statement-2 is NOT a correct explanation for Statement-1

C

Statement-1 is True , Statement-2 is False

D

Statement-1 is False , Statement-2 is True

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To analyze the statements regarding the basicity of \( \text{Lu(OH)}_3 \) and \( \text{Ce(OH)}_3 \), we will break down the reasoning step by step. ### Step 1: Understanding the Compounds Both \( \text{Lu(OH)}_3 \) and \( \text{Ce(OH)}_3 \) are hydroxides of lanthanide elements, specifically lutetium (Lu) and cerium (Ce). In these compounds, lutetium and cerium exist in the +3 oxidation state as \( \text{Lu}^{3+} \) and \( \text{Ce}^{3+} \). ### Step 2: Comparing Ionic Sizes Lutetium is located towards the end of the lanthanide series, while cerium is located towards the beginning. As we move from lanthanum (La) to lutetium (Lu), the size of the lanthanide ions decreases due to the increase in nuclear charge without a significant increase in shielding. Thus, \( \text{Lu}^{3+} \) is smaller than \( \text{Ce}^{3+} \). ### Step 3: Basicity of Hydroxides The basicity of metal hydroxides is influenced by the size of the metal ion. Smaller metal ions tend to form more covalent bonds with hydroxide ions, leading to a higher covalent character in the hydroxide. As the covalent character increases, the basicity decreases. ### Step 4: Analyzing the Statements - **Statement 1**: \( \text{Lu(OH)}_3 \) is more basic than \( \text{Ce(OH)}_3 \). - This statement is **incorrect**. Since \( \text{Lu}^{3+} \) is smaller than \( \text{Ce}^{3+} \), \( \text{Lu(OH)}_3 \) will have a higher covalent character and thus lower basicity compared to \( \text{Ce(OH)}_3 \). - **Statement 2**: \( \text{Lu}^{3+} \) has a smaller size than \( \text{Ce}^{3+} \). - This statement is **correct**. As established, \( \text{Lu}^{3+} \) is indeed smaller than \( \text{Ce}^{3+} \). ### Conclusion - **Statement 1** is false. - **Statement 2** is true. Thus, the correct answer is that Statement 1 is false and Statement 2 is true.
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • THE D AND F-BLOCK ELEMENTS

    AAKASH INSTITUTE ENGLISH|Exercise Assingment ( Section-F Matrix-Match Type Questions )|3 Videos
  • THE D AND F-BLOCK ELEMENTS

    AAKASH INSTITUTE ENGLISH|Exercise Assingment ( Section-G Integer Answer Type Questions )|5 Videos
  • THE D AND F-BLOCK ELEMENTS

    AAKASH INSTITUTE ENGLISH|Exercise Assingment ( Section-D Linked Comprehension Type Questions ) Comprehension-II|3 Videos
  • Test-12

    AAKASH INSTITUTE ENGLISH|Exercise Exercise|58 Videos
  • THE P-BLOCK ELEMENTS

    AAKASH INSTITUTE ENGLISH|Exercise Assignment Section-J)|16 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Why Ce(OH)_(3) is more basic than Lu(OH)_(3) ?

Why Ce(OH)_(3) is more basic than Lu(OH)_(3) ?

CsOH is more basic than Ba(OH)_(2) .

Al^(3+) is smaller than Ca^(2+) .

PH_3 is less basic than NH_3 .

Tl(OH)_3 is less basic than TlOH . Why ?

State True/False La(OH)_3 is less basic than Lu(OH)_3

STATEMENT-1: Co(NH_(3))_(6)^(+3) is more stable than (Co(en)_(2)(NH_(3))_(2))^(+3) and STATEMENT-2: Chelation is more in [Co(en)_(2)(NH_(3))_(2)]^(+3) than [Co(NH_(3))_(6)]^(+3)

Assertion : La(OH)_(3) is more basic than Lu(OH)_(3) . Reason : Size of Lu^(3+) increases and shows more covalent character.

Which is more basic La(OH)_(3) zor Lu(OH)_3 ? Why?