Assertion: Rhipidium is a type of helicoid uniparouscyme.
Reason: Sorosis fruit is an aggregated fruit.

Options

A. If both As and R are correct and R is correct explanation of As
B. If both As and R are correct but R is not correct explanation of As
C. If As is correct, R is wrong
D. If both As and R are wrong.

Answer

To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided.

### Step 1: Analyze the Assertion
The assertion states that "Rhipidium is a type of helicoid uniparous cyme."
- **Definition**: Rhipidium is indeed a type of inflorescence where flowers are arranged in a single plane and can suppress each other.
- **Helicoid Uniparous Cyme**: This type of inflorescence has flowers originating from one side of the main axis, forming a coiled structure.

**Conclusion**: The assertion is **false** because Rhipidium does not fit the definition of a helicoid uniparous cyme.

### Step 2: Analyze the Reason
The reason states that "Sorosis fruit is an aggregated fruit."
- **Definition of Sorosis**: Sorosis is a type of fruit that is formed from a cluster of flowers (multiple flowers) and is characterized by a fleshy structure. A common example is pineapple.
- **Definition of Aggregated Fruit**: Aggregated fruits are formed from multiple ovaries of a single flower. An example is raspberry.

**Conclusion**: The reason is also **false** because sorosis is not an aggregated fruit; it is a composite fruit formed from multiple flowers.

### Step 3: Determine the Relationship
Since both the assertion and the reason are false, we can conclude that they are not related to each other.

### Final Answer
Both the assertion and the reason are false. Therefore, the correct answer is Option 4: Both assertion and reason are wrong.

---