Assertion `:-` Analysis of urine helps in clinical diagnosis of many metabolic disorder. Reason `:-` Glycosuria is indicative of diabetes insipidus.

Options

A. If both Assertion & Reason are True & the Reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion .
B. If both Assertion & Reason are True but Reason is not a correct explanation of the Assertion
C. If Assertion is True but the Reason is False.
D. If both Assertion & Reason are false.

Answer

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**: The assertion states that "Analysis of urine helps in clinical diagnosis of many metabolic disorders." This is true. Urine analysis can reveal various abnormalities that indicate specific metabolic disorders, such as the presence of glucose, proteins, or ketones.

2. **Understanding the Reason**: The reason states that "Glycosuria is indicative of diabetes insipidus." This is false. Glycosuria, which is the presence of glucose in urine, is typically associated with diabetes mellitus, not diabetes insipidus.

3. **Differentiating Diabetes Conditions**:
- **Diabetes Mellitus**: Characterized by high blood sugar levels which can lead to glycosuria.
- **Diabetes Insipidus**: Characterized by a deficiency of the antidiuretic hormone (ADH), leading to excessive urination but not necessarily related to glucose levels in urine.

4. **Conclusion**: Since the assertion is true and the reason is false, the correct relationship between them is that the assertion is correct while the reason is incorrect.

5. **Final Answer**: The assertion is true, and the reason is false. Therefore, the correct option is that the assertion is true, but the reason is false.