Assertion `:-` Haemodialysis method is used in case of kidney failure.
Reason `:-` Malfunctioning of kidney leads to uremia.

Options

A. If both Assertion & Reason are True & the Reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion .
B. If both Assertion & Reason are True but Reason is not a correct explanation of the Assertion
C. If Assertion is True but the Reason is False.
D. If both Assertion & Reason are false.

Answer

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**:
- The assertion states that "Haemodialysis method is used in case of kidney failure."
- This statement is true because haemodialysis is a medical procedure that artificially filters waste products from the blood when the kidneys can no longer perform this function due to failure.

2. **Understanding the Reason**:
- The reason provided is "Malfunctioning of kidney leads to uremia."
- This statement is also true. Uremia refers to the accumulation of waste products, particularly urea, in the blood due to the kidneys' inability to excrete them.

3. **Analyzing the Relationship**:
- While both statements are true, we need to determine if the reason correctly explains the assertion.
- The assertion about haemodialysis being used in kidney failure is not directly explained by the reason about uremia. While uremia is a consequence of kidney failure, it does not specifically justify why haemodialysis is the chosen treatment.

4. **Conclusion**:
- Therefore, the final conclusion is that both the assertion and the reason are true, but the reason does not serve as a correct explanation for the assertion. The answer is that both statements are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation for the assertion.

### Final Answer:
Both assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not a correct explanation of the assertion.

---