Assertion : Gold occurs in native state.
Reason : Gold is a reactive metal.

Options

A. If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.
B. IF both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion.
C. If assertion is true but reason is false.
D. If both assertion and reason are false.

Explanation

To analyze the assertion and reason provided in the question, we will break down the concepts related to gold and its reactivity.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**:
- The assertion states that "Gold occurs in native state."
- This means that gold can be found in its pure, metallic form in nature, without being combined with other elements. This is true as gold is one of the few metals that can be found in its elemental form.

2. **Understanding the Reason**:
- The reason states that "Gold is a reactive metal."
- This statement is misleading. Gold is actually known for being one of the least reactive metals. It does not easily react with oxygen, moisture, or other elements, which is why it can exist in its native state.

3. **Evaluating the Relationship**:
- The assertion is true because gold does occur in a native state.
- The reason is false because gold is not a reactive metal; it is quite unreactive compared to many other metals.

4. **Conclusion**:
- Since the assertion is true and the reason is false, the overall statement is incorrect. The correct relationship is that gold’s occurrence in the native state is not due to it being a reactive metal, but rather due to its low reactivity.

### Final Answer:
- Assertion: True
- Reason: False