STATEMENT-1: A cloth covers a table. Some dishes are kept on it. The cloth can be pulled out without dislodging the dishes from the table.
STATEMENT-2: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Options

A. statement -I is true ,statement II is true ,Statement II is the correct explanation for statement -I
B. Statement -I is true ,Statement II is true statement II is not the correct explanation for statement -I
C. Statement -I is true ,Statement II is false
D. Statement -I is false ,Statement II is true

Explanation

To analyze the statements given in the question, we will break down the concepts involved step by step.

### Step 1: Understanding Statement 1
**Statement 1:** A cloth covers a table. Some dishes are kept on it. The cloth can be pulled out without dislodging the dishes from the table.

**Explanation:** This phenomenon can be explained by the concept of inertia. Inertia is the tendency of an object to resist changes in its state of motion. The dishes, when at rest, tend to remain at rest due to their inertia. When the cloth is pulled quickly, the dishes do not have enough time to react to the change, and thus they remain in their position on the table.

### Step 2: Understanding Statement 2
**Statement 2:** For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

**Explanation:** This statement is a reflection of Newton's Third Law of Motion. It states that for every force exerted by one object on another, there is a force of equal magnitude but in the opposite direction exerted by the second object on the first. While this law is true, it does not directly explain why the dishes remain in place when the cloth is pulled.

### Step 3: Analyzing the Relationship Between the Two Statements
- **Inertia (Statement 1):** The dishes remain in place due to their inertia, which keeps them at rest despite the movement of the cloth.
- **Newton's Third Law (Statement 2):** Although this law is valid, it does not provide a direct explanation for the scenario described in Statement 1. The action of pulling the cloth does not create a reaction that would dislodge the dishes because the dishes are not acted upon by a sufficient force to overcome their inertia.

### Conclusion
- **Correctness of Statements:** Statement 1 is true and can be explained by the concept of inertia. Statement 2 is also true but does not serve as a correct explanation for Statement 1. Therefore, we conclude that Statement 1 is true, while Statement 2, although true, does not explain Statement 1.

### Final Answer
- **Statement 1 is true, and Statement 2 is true but does not explain Statement 1.**

---