Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
Back bonding in BF(3) does not afect...

Back bonding in `BF_(3)` does not afect

A

Statement -1 is true, Statement-2 is true and statement-2 is correct explanation for statement -1.

B

Statement-1 is true, statement-2 is true and statement-2 is NOT the correct explanation for statement-1

C

Statement-1 is true, statement-2 is false

D

Statement-1 is false, statement-2 is true.

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

The correct Answer is:
A
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Assertion : BF_(3) undergoes in partial hydrolysis Reason : Due to strong back bonding in BF_(3) only two flouride groups have come out on nucleaophili attack by H_(2)O .

Assertion : BF_(3) undergoes in partial hydrolysis Reason : Due to strong back bonding in BF_(3) only two flouride groups have come out on nucleaophili attack by H_(2)O .

BF_(3) is.

BF_(3)+HFto

Assertion : Bond dissociation energy of B-F bond in BF_(3) molecule is lower than C-F bond in CF_(4) molecule. Reason : Atomic size of B-atom is larger than that of C-atom.

Assertion : Bond dissociation energy of B-F bond in BF_(3) molecule is lower than C-F bond in CF_(4) molecule. Reason : Atomic size of B-atom is larger than that of C-atom.

It has been observed that BF_(3) does not hydrolyses completely whereas BCl_(3) or BBr_(3) get easily hydrolysed to form B(OH)_(3) and HX ? Explain.

Which one of the following statement regardings BF_(3) is not correct ?

Why is BF_(3) a Lewis acid?

Assertion BF_(3) is a weaker Lewis acid than BCI_(3) Reasoning In BF_(3) molecule, back bonding (ppi-ppi) is stronger than in BCI_(3) .